View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sbehuniak09
Joined: 10 Jul 2012 Posts: 229 Location: Seymour, CT
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 1:52 pm Post subject: Guess That Weight! Pt. 2 |
|
|
Ok so a new Wednesday night of fishing brings us a new round of guess that weight. Since people seemed to enjoy it last week I'll give it another shot. Unfortunately I will not be making any appearances this week as I was stuck catching all dinks. Once again I will give a few days for guesses then reveal the real sizes and see how everyone did. The fish were all weighed digitally so I trust their accuracy. I will provide a few images of each to help out a bit!
Fish #1
Fish #2
Fish #3
_________________ The fishing was good; it was the catching that was bad. ~A.K. Best |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zegermanznew
Joined: 05 Aug 2012 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
#1 - 3lb 10oz
#2 - 4lb 13oz
#3 - 4lb 3oz
Thanks for doing this again, I was quietly hoping you would.
P.S. Please start catching your fish earlier so we can get some daylight pics. haha |
|
Back to top |
|
zegermanznew
Joined: 05 Aug 2012 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
#1 - 3lb 10oz
#2 - 4lb 13oz
#3 - 4lb 3oz
Thanks for doing this again, I was quietly hoping you would.
P.S. Please start catching your fish earlier so we can get some daylight pics. haha |
|
Back to top |
|
rmflint
Joined: 16 Mar 2012 Posts: 360 Location: Wallingford
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I still don't believe the weight of the first one. My digit scale does not lie though. I may have hit the clear scale button though, but I am doubtful. Its the fish that matters not the weight. _________________ You know it was a good day when your thumb is all scratched up. |
|
Back to top |
|
PECo
Joined: 06 Oct 2009 Posts: 5203 Location: Avon, CT
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fish #1 3.25 pounds
Fish #2 3.12 pounds
Fish #3 2.85 pounds _________________ Don't forget to wear sunscreen and don't litter! |
|
Back to top |
|
SaTP
Joined: 26 Jun 2012 Posts: 46 Location: Rocky Hill
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1. 3 lb 3 oz
2. 3 lb 11 oz
3. 3 lb 8 oz |
|
Back to top |
|
|
x182dan
Joined: 19 Mar 2009 Posts: 329 Location: Seymour, CT
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PECo wrote: | Fish #1 3.25 pounds
Fish #2 3.12 pounds
Fish #3 2.85 pounds |
I think your pretty close so I agree with your guesses _________________ Never Stop Learning |
|
Back to top |
|
DirtyDawg10
Joined: 27 May 2009 Posts: 2238 Location: Granby, CT
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some nice fish!
1 - 2.5 lbs
2 - 3.25 lbs
3 - 3 lbs |
|
Back to top |
|
rmflint
Joined: 16 Mar 2012 Posts: 360 Location: Wallingford
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ooof...rough crowd _________________ You know it was a good day when your thumb is all scratched up. |
|
Back to top |
|
x182dan
Joined: 19 Mar 2009 Posts: 329 Location: Seymour, CT
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rmflint wrote: | ooof...rough crowd |
Hey you asked for it! Get a measurement on them if you want an accurate guess. Also dont forget your digital scale is not 100% accurate its probably pretty close though. _________________ Never Stop Learning |
|
Back to top |
|
rmflint
Joined: 16 Mar 2012 Posts: 360 Location: Wallingford
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
We got lengths and my scale its very accurate. I weighed it. _________________ You know it was a good day when your thumb is all scratched up. |
|
Back to top |
|
x182dan
Joined: 19 Mar 2009 Posts: 329 Location: Seymour, CT
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 9:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
rmflint wrote: | We got lengths and my scale its very accurate. I weighed it. |
well post the length if you want a real accurate guess. Its hard to tell length from the pictures but i bet guesses would be a lot closer with you posting length. The more I look at it I think number #2 could be a 3.5-4lber. _________________ Never Stop Learning |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rmflint
Joined: 16 Mar 2012 Posts: 360 Location: Wallingford
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Haha not posting the lengths is the funny part. _________________ You know it was a good day when your thumb is all scratched up. |
|
Back to top |
|
zegermanznew
Joined: 05 Aug 2012 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting points.
You should post the length after a day or two and see if you get a change between guesses and guesstimates.
FWIW, I think girth or circumference would make the biggest difference. |
|
Back to top |
|
sbehuniak09
Joined: 10 Jul 2012 Posts: 229 Location: Seymour, CT
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, sorry it took a while but here are the answers. This round was some better guesses I would say but in general they were a bit light again with the exception of the first one.
Fish #1 Range: 2.5-3.63 Average: 3.16 Length: ~16"
Actual: 2.84
Fish #2 Range: 3.12-4.81 Average: 3.59 Length: 20"
Actual: 4.12
Fish #3 Range: 2.85-4.18 Average: 3.28 Length: 19"
Actual: 3.62
So, the averages show that you were able to tell the order of fish size and the actual weight was always within the range. No matter what, these were some really nice fish! _________________ The fishing was good; it was the catching that was bad. ~A.K. Best |
|
Back to top |
|
|